1 00:00:13,009 --> 00:00:10,810 [Music] 2 00:00:14,770 --> 00:00:13,019 great hi everyone 3 00:00:17,390 --> 00:00:14,780 um yeah so my name is Rachel surprise 4 00:00:19,130 --> 00:00:17,400 I'm a PhD candidate at the University of 5 00:00:21,590 --> 00:00:19,140 California Riverside and today I'm going 6 00:00:23,269 --> 00:00:21,600 to be talking to you all about the 7 00:00:25,310 --> 00:00:23,279 sedimentological signatures of 8 00:00:27,830 --> 00:00:25,320 backgrounds in the pre-cambrian a novel 9 00:00:29,870 --> 00:00:27,840 method for their detection automated 10 00:00:31,550 --> 00:00:29,880 detection in remote contexts and 11 00:00:32,510 --> 00:00:31,560 implications for the search for Life on 12 00:00:34,430 --> 00:00:32,520 Mars 13 00:00:36,410 --> 00:00:34,440 so 14 00:00:38,090 --> 00:00:36,420 it's well accepted that in Mars has 15 00:00:40,729 --> 00:00:38,100 passed there was liquid water on the 16 00:00:42,170 --> 00:00:40,739 surface right so this provides the 17 00:00:44,690 --> 00:00:42,180 potential for there to have been past 18 00:00:46,490 --> 00:00:44,700 microbial life and when we're thinking 19 00:00:48,110 --> 00:00:46,500 about looking for evidence of this past 20 00:00:49,190 --> 00:00:48,120 microbial life a lot of people in this 21 00:00:50,690 --> 00:00:49,200 room 22 00:00:52,790 --> 00:00:50,700 um like to think about 23 00:00:55,970 --> 00:00:52,800 signatures of this microbial life that 24 00:00:58,330 --> 00:00:55,980 are microscopic or molecular but as a 25 00:01:01,189 --> 00:00:58,340 paleontologist I'm more interested in 26 00:01:03,349 --> 00:01:01,199 macroscopic textural signatures that we 27 00:01:06,649 --> 00:01:03,359 can observe in the sedimentological 28 00:01:08,990 --> 00:01:06,659 record from standard imagery right 29 00:01:11,510 --> 00:01:09,000 so to find these types of signatures 30 00:01:13,490 --> 00:01:11,520 that could be useful for the search for 31 00:01:16,550 --> 00:01:13,500 Life on Mars we can turn to the 32 00:01:18,830 --> 00:01:16,560 Precambrian Earth which is a really 33 00:01:21,289 --> 00:01:18,840 useful data set for us to think about 34 00:01:23,149 --> 00:01:21,299 how past microbial life expresses itself 35 00:01:28,429 --> 00:01:23,159 in the sedimentological record because 36 00:01:29,810 --> 00:01:28,439 it is dominated by a record of organic 37 00:01:32,450 --> 00:01:29,820 matte grounds 38 00:01:35,210 --> 00:01:32,460 um during a time when life on Earth was 39 00:01:35,990 --> 00:01:35,220 very simple right 40 00:01:39,230 --> 00:01:36,000 um 41 00:01:41,390 --> 00:01:39,240 and luckily uh these organic backgrounds 42 00:01:44,330 --> 00:01:41,400 formed by a consortia of prokaryotes and 43 00:01:46,190 --> 00:01:44,340 eukaryotes mainly single cellular 44 00:01:48,109 --> 00:01:46,200 um have a significant impact on the 45 00:01:50,090 --> 00:01:48,119 sedimentological record 46 00:01:51,469 --> 00:01:50,100 um we heard earlier today about 47 00:01:54,170 --> 00:01:51,479 something called the extracellular 48 00:01:56,090 --> 00:01:54,180 polymeric substance that microbes 49 00:01:58,249 --> 00:01:56,100 excrete when they are forming a 50 00:02:00,649 --> 00:01:58,259 background that is just kind of this 51 00:02:03,289 --> 00:02:00,659 like sticky substrate and this has an 52 00:02:06,230 --> 00:02:03,299 impact on the sedimentological record in 53 00:02:08,809 --> 00:02:06,240 that it binds baffles and traps sediment 54 00:02:11,029 --> 00:02:08,819 that it is living on and within and thus 55 00:02:13,790 --> 00:02:11,039 prevents erosion and stabilizes sediment 56 00:02:15,229 --> 00:02:13,800 in part this contributes to in carbonate 57 00:02:16,490 --> 00:02:15,239 settings things that you'll probably 58 00:02:18,710 --> 00:02:16,500 you're probably familiar with like 59 00:02:20,930 --> 00:02:18,720 microbialites and stromatolites 60 00:02:22,670 --> 00:02:20,940 but I'm more interested in how this is 61 00:02:24,589 --> 00:02:22,680 expressed in solicit clastic settings 62 00:02:26,869 --> 00:02:24,599 which is broadly applicable to the 63 00:02:29,030 --> 00:02:26,879 Martian geologic environment right and 64 00:02:30,770 --> 00:02:29,040 one way that it can be expressed is in 65 00:02:32,809 --> 00:02:30,780 texture organic surfaces or iterative 66 00:02:34,190 --> 00:02:32,819 Organo sedimentary surface textures I'm 67 00:02:36,110 --> 00:02:34,200 showing you an example of that up here 68 00:02:37,790 --> 00:02:36,120 on the right that's actually a fossil 69 00:02:40,550 --> 00:02:37,800 surface 70 00:02:42,949 --> 00:02:40,560 um and they also impact 71 00:02:46,009 --> 00:02:42,959 um sedimentological packaging in a way 72 00:02:47,390 --> 00:02:46,019 that we can identify and cross-section 73 00:02:49,369 --> 00:02:47,400 so 74 00:02:50,809 --> 00:02:49,379 when I'm talking about kind of these 75 00:02:52,670 --> 00:02:50,819 background bio signatures I think this 76 00:02:54,110 --> 00:02:52,680 brings up a really important question 77 00:02:56,750 --> 00:02:54,120 that I want to kind of frame my whole 78 00:02:58,850 --> 00:02:56,760 talk in in which is that if life ever 79 00:03:00,589 --> 00:02:58,860 existed on Mars was it ever abundant 80 00:03:02,990 --> 00:03:00,599 enough to form organic backgrounds and 81 00:03:04,910 --> 00:03:03,000 impact the sedimentological record on a 82 00:03:06,290 --> 00:03:04,920 macro macroscopic scale like we see in 83 00:03:09,530 --> 00:03:06,300 the Precambrian 84 00:03:10,509 --> 00:03:09,540 and my answer to that is I don't know 85 00:03:12,710 --> 00:03:10,519 um 86 00:03:15,290 --> 00:03:12,720 and the more I think about it the less 87 00:03:17,809 --> 00:03:15,300 I'm convinced that it ever did but this 88 00:03:20,390 --> 00:03:17,819 is still an outstanding question that we 89 00:03:21,890 --> 00:03:20,400 need to think about and there's one way 90 00:03:23,930 --> 00:03:21,900 to find out 91 00:03:26,509 --> 00:03:23,940 um and again this is to Leverage The 92 00:03:29,390 --> 00:03:26,519 pre-kame Brand Rock record so as I 93 00:03:31,850 --> 00:03:29,400 mentioned we have billions of years of 94 00:03:34,550 --> 00:03:31,860 evidence of backgrounds existing in the 95 00:03:36,170 --> 00:03:34,560 pre-cambrian a lot of which is fossil 96 00:03:37,490 --> 00:03:36,180 evidence of maths like what I'm showing 97 00:03:39,229 --> 00:03:37,500 up here on the right 98 00:03:40,789 --> 00:03:39,239 these are not great bio signatures for 99 00:03:42,670 --> 00:03:40,799 the search for Life on Mars because it 100 00:03:46,729 --> 00:03:42,680 to identify them you would need to 101 00:03:48,770 --> 00:03:46,739 excavate betting planes and it also 102 00:03:51,589 --> 00:03:48,780 relies on the fossilization of these 103 00:03:54,649 --> 00:03:51,599 surfaces that 104 00:03:56,149 --> 00:03:54,659 um necessitates a lot of comp like a 105 00:03:57,649 --> 00:03:56,159 suite of complex taphenomic or 106 00:04:00,229 --> 00:03:57,659 preservational processes that are not 107 00:04:02,690 --> 00:04:00,239 guaranteed to have existed on Mars 108 00:04:06,770 --> 00:04:02,700 um so instead I'm interested in looking 109 00:04:08,449 --> 00:04:06,780 at the impacts of backgrounds and that 110 00:04:10,429 --> 00:04:08,459 the extra polymeric substance 111 00:04:11,809 --> 00:04:10,439 extracellular polymeric substance that 112 00:04:15,289 --> 00:04:11,819 they secrete 113 00:04:17,449 --> 00:04:15,299 um on sedimentological packaging 114 00:04:19,310 --> 00:04:17,459 um as it manifests as discrete 115 00:04:21,170 --> 00:04:19,320 sedimentary structures 116 00:04:23,629 --> 00:04:21,180 um that cannot occur in the absence of 117 00:04:26,150 --> 00:04:23,639 biological mediation 118 00:04:27,830 --> 00:04:26,160 so one of these sedimentological 119 00:04:30,710 --> 00:04:27,840 signatures that I'm talking about today 120 00:04:32,510 --> 00:04:30,720 are called Palm says ripples so I'm 121 00:04:33,890 --> 00:04:32,520 showing you images of those here these 122 00:04:36,170 --> 00:04:33,900 are from the milpena edioca national 123 00:04:38,629 --> 00:04:36,180 park in South Australia which was 124 00:04:41,210 --> 00:04:38,639 recently opened as a national park oh my 125 00:04:42,469 --> 00:04:41,220 animations are weird sorry about that 126 00:04:43,850 --> 00:04:42,479 um but if you want to read more about it 127 00:04:45,170 --> 00:04:43,860 it was published 128 00:04:46,850 --> 00:04:45,180 um 129 00:04:49,370 --> 00:04:46,860 a little story about the national park 130 00:04:52,189 --> 00:04:49,380 in NASA astrobiology recently 131 00:04:55,850 --> 00:04:52,199 um but Palm says ripples are defined as 132 00:04:57,890 --> 00:04:55,860 stacks of sandstone bedding planes that 133 00:04:59,930 --> 00:04:57,900 have rippled bottoms and ripple top 134 00:05:01,550 --> 00:04:59,940 surfaces so 135 00:05:03,469 --> 00:05:01,560 we can see if we look at this betting 136 00:05:04,430 --> 00:05:03,479 plane here their ripples preserved on 137 00:05:06,950 --> 00:05:04,440 the top 138 00:05:08,870 --> 00:05:06,960 as well as on the bottom but what does 139 00:05:10,730 --> 00:05:08,880 this mean in terms of like evidence for 140 00:05:12,830 --> 00:05:10,740 life right 141 00:05:14,450 --> 00:05:12,840 um we can look at this figure here to 142 00:05:16,310 --> 00:05:14,460 see kind of the biological processes 143 00:05:19,490 --> 00:05:16,320 behind the formation of these Palm says 144 00:05:21,469 --> 00:05:19,500 ripples so looking at uh section B of 145 00:05:24,170 --> 00:05:21,479 this figure when we think about 146 00:05:26,810 --> 00:05:24,180 pre-cambrian ecosystems microbial mats 147 00:05:28,909 --> 00:05:26,820 were ubiquitous within the world's 148 00:05:31,790 --> 00:05:28,919 oceans covering the sea floor 149 00:05:33,710 --> 00:05:31,800 so when these mats grew on the sea floor 150 00:05:35,510 --> 00:05:33,720 what they would do is stabilize the 151 00:05:39,230 --> 00:05:35,520 rippled surfaces 152 00:05:40,969 --> 00:05:39,240 so when a new depositional event 153 00:05:44,390 --> 00:05:40,979 occurred 154 00:05:46,310 --> 00:05:44,400 the ripples were not eroded 155 00:05:47,990 --> 00:05:46,320 um and are thus cast on the base of the 156 00:05:50,150 --> 00:05:48,000 new depositional event 157 00:05:52,070 --> 00:05:50,160 and then the two betting planes remain 158 00:05:53,629 --> 00:05:52,080 as discrete bed forms that are not 159 00:05:56,629 --> 00:05:53,639 Amalgamated together 160 00:05:58,790 --> 00:05:56,639 so this then 161 00:06:00,409 --> 00:05:58,800 continues as a process resulting in 162 00:06:03,230 --> 00:06:00,419 stacks of these Sandstone bedding planes 163 00:06:07,430 --> 00:06:03,240 with no fine brain inner beds 164 00:06:09,770 --> 00:06:07,440 um and is a definitive signature of past 165 00:06:11,270 --> 00:06:09,780 life that cannot occur in the absence of 166 00:06:12,890 --> 00:06:11,280 biological mediation so this is 167 00:06:14,749 --> 00:06:12,900 potentially a really interesting 168 00:06:15,770 --> 00:06:14,759 biosignature for us to keep in mind when 169 00:06:16,969 --> 00:06:15,780 we're thinking about the search for Life 170 00:06:19,790 --> 00:06:16,979 on Mars 171 00:06:21,770 --> 00:06:19,800 and just you can compare it to kind of 172 00:06:23,749 --> 00:06:21,780 modern processes 173 00:06:25,670 --> 00:06:23,759 um or broadleafana result conditions 174 00:06:27,110 --> 00:06:25,680 where we don't have backgrounds if you 175 00:06:30,230 --> 00:06:27,120 get the deposition of sandstone on 176 00:06:31,730 --> 00:06:30,240 Sandstone the ripples are going to erode 177 00:06:33,350 --> 00:06:31,740 and the betting planes are going to 178 00:06:34,850 --> 00:06:33,360 become Amalgamated resulting in a 179 00:06:36,950 --> 00:06:34,860 cross-section something like this so you 180 00:06:40,010 --> 00:06:36,960 can tell that they're very distinct 181 00:06:43,510 --> 00:06:40,020 um cross-sections one with definitive 182 00:06:45,950 --> 00:06:43,520 evidence of past microbial life 183 00:06:47,870 --> 00:06:45,960 so all in all we can see that Palm says 184 00:06:50,029 --> 00:06:47,880 ripples are 185 00:06:51,290 --> 00:06:50,039 potentially good biosignatures for us to 186 00:06:53,749 --> 00:06:51,300 keep in mind because they cannot be 187 00:06:55,550 --> 00:06:53,759 formed by abiotic processes 188 00:06:56,870 --> 00:06:55,560 and they can occur when and that is very 189 00:06:59,210 --> 00:06:56,880 thin so they can even occur under 190 00:07:01,610 --> 00:06:59,220 biofilm mediation so where it's not 191 00:07:03,469 --> 00:07:01,620 dependent on the presence of eukaryotes 192 00:07:05,510 --> 00:07:03,479 and they're easily identifiable as 193 00:07:07,610 --> 00:07:05,520 macroscopic features in standard imagery 194 00:07:10,370 --> 00:07:07,620 so you don't need a ton of analytical 195 00:07:11,809 --> 00:07:10,380 methods to identify them 196 00:07:14,390 --> 00:07:11,819 but this is not to say there are no 197 00:07:16,129 --> 00:07:14,400 limitations right firstly this is 198 00:07:18,230 --> 00:07:16,139 restricted to rippled Bases you have to 199 00:07:20,089 --> 00:07:18,240 have ripples occurring 200 00:07:21,350 --> 00:07:20,099 um in order for this to be identifiable 201 00:07:23,330 --> 00:07:21,360 and cross-section 202 00:07:26,390 --> 00:07:23,340 but we know these are preserved on Mars 203 00:07:28,189 --> 00:07:26,400 so this doesn't preclude the use of this 204 00:07:29,809 --> 00:07:28,199 feature as a biosignature 205 00:07:32,150 --> 00:07:29,819 and additionally the lithological 206 00:07:35,330 --> 00:07:32,160 criteria is narrow you have to be I be 207 00:07:37,430 --> 00:07:35,340 able to identify the fact that this 208 00:07:39,770 --> 00:07:37,440 cross-section is comprised of only 209 00:07:42,409 --> 00:07:39,780 sandstone and nothing no like Clays or 210 00:07:43,249 --> 00:07:42,419 silts um but again this is an ability we 211 00:07:43,850 --> 00:07:43,259 have 212 00:07:47,930 --> 00:07:43,860 um 213 00:07:50,450 --> 00:07:47,940 to ascertain on the Martian surface so 214 00:07:52,490 --> 00:07:50,460 with this in mind we can kind of think 215 00:07:54,950 --> 00:07:52,500 about well then how would we detect them 216 00:07:56,809 --> 00:07:54,960 right I could go through by hand and 217 00:07:59,749 --> 00:07:56,819 look at all of the images coming out 218 00:08:01,430 --> 00:07:59,759 from the Mars perseverance Rover 219 00:08:02,689 --> 00:08:01,440 um but that's time consuming right so 220 00:08:06,469 --> 00:08:02,699 there's some things we need to consider 221 00:08:07,850 --> 00:08:06,479 in actually using this as a biosignature 222 00:08:09,650 --> 00:08:07,860 um first you know there's a large number 223 00:08:11,330 --> 00:08:09,660 of images 224 00:08:14,390 --> 00:08:11,340 we would ideally like to have rapid 225 00:08:16,430 --> 00:08:14,400 identification of these features like as 226 00:08:17,930 --> 00:08:16,440 the images are taken so we can identify 227 00:08:20,270 --> 00:08:17,940 Target sites of interest for further 228 00:08:22,309 --> 00:08:20,280 analysis because Palm says ripples alone 229 00:08:24,830 --> 00:08:22,319 will not be enough evidence for us to be 230 00:08:26,809 --> 00:08:24,840 like oh there was life 231 00:08:27,950 --> 00:08:26,819 um you would need expertise in 232 00:08:29,510 --> 00:08:27,960 backgrounds and their impact on the 233 00:08:31,070 --> 00:08:29,520 sedimentological record 234 00:08:33,730 --> 00:08:31,080 and of course you want to minimize human 235 00:08:36,589 --> 00:08:33,740 error so with all these caveats in mind 236 00:08:38,570 --> 00:08:36,599 I was kind of thinking you know maybe 237 00:08:39,649 --> 00:08:38,580 the best way for us to approach this 238 00:08:43,010 --> 00:08:39,659 problem 239 00:08:45,650 --> 00:08:43,020 is to use an automated technique to 240 00:08:47,329 --> 00:08:45,660 identify polysest ripples in images of 241 00:08:51,350 --> 00:08:47,339 cross sections 242 00:08:53,690 --> 00:08:51,360 so this is exactly what I did but I am 243 00:08:55,730 --> 00:08:53,700 not an expert in this so I collaborated 244 00:08:58,310 --> 00:08:55,740 with the visualization in intelligent 245 00:09:00,410 --> 00:08:58,320 systems laboratory or viz lab in the 246 00:09:02,810 --> 00:09:00,420 College of Engineering at UCR and worked 247 00:09:05,930 --> 00:09:02,820 with Dr birbanu and Padma John oligata 248 00:09:07,430 --> 00:09:05,940 who did a lot of this work with me 249 00:09:09,949 --> 00:09:07,440 and the first thing I did was show them 250 00:09:12,350 --> 00:09:09,959 my data set from the pre-cambrian 251 00:09:14,990 --> 00:09:12,360 sedimentological record of we had 252 00:09:16,910 --> 00:09:15,000 starting about 200 images of palm cess 253 00:09:20,329 --> 00:09:16,920 ripples because this project was born in 254 00:09:20,990 --> 00:09:20,339 covid and I had no access to the field 255 00:09:22,370 --> 00:09:21,000 um 256 00:09:24,829 --> 00:09:22,380 so we started with this relatively 257 00:09:26,210 --> 00:09:24,839 limited data set and identified caveats 258 00:09:28,730 --> 00:09:26,220 of the data set that the program would 259 00:09:30,889 --> 00:09:28,740 need to overcome including variable 260 00:09:32,630 --> 00:09:30,899 scale of images variable resolution of 261 00:09:34,130 --> 00:09:32,640 images and it would need to have the 262 00:09:35,690 --> 00:09:34,140 ability to account for extraneous 263 00:09:38,329 --> 00:09:35,700 features that are not related to pound 264 00:09:40,490 --> 00:09:38,339 cess ripples like plants fractures Talus 265 00:09:42,769 --> 00:09:40,500 dust and shadows 266 00:09:44,990 --> 00:09:42,779 um and all three of these problems are 267 00:09:48,050 --> 00:09:45,000 problems that we would also have 268 00:09:50,449 --> 00:09:48,060 um in like Mars or images coming from 269 00:09:51,530 --> 00:09:50,459 Mars besides the plants 270 00:09:54,009 --> 00:09:51,540 um 271 00:09:57,470 --> 00:09:54,019 so we started developing this program 272 00:09:59,449 --> 00:09:57,480 and phase one we developed the scene 273 00:10:01,970 --> 00:09:59,459 aware perception augmentation using 274 00:10:03,230 --> 00:10:01,980 composite embedding for segmentation or 275 00:10:04,790 --> 00:10:03,240 space egg 276 00:10:09,230 --> 00:10:04,800 which uses 277 00:10:11,030 --> 00:10:09,240 Cora and sge to identify images 278 00:10:13,910 --> 00:10:11,040 um pounds as ripples in images about 279 00:10:15,530 --> 00:10:13,920 crop so these are just kind of a 280 00:10:17,570 --> 00:10:15,540 schematic of those different different 281 00:10:20,150 --> 00:10:17,580 methodologies if you're interested in 282 00:10:21,350 --> 00:10:20,160 the actual computer vision aspect of it 283 00:10:24,650 --> 00:10:21,360 I encourage you to look at our paper 284 00:10:28,009 --> 00:10:24,660 genre without it at all 2021 285 00:10:30,710 --> 00:10:28,019 and this first past this first pass 286 00:10:33,590 --> 00:10:30,720 their phase one development 287 00:10:35,389 --> 00:10:33,600 um was able to identify policest ripples 288 00:10:37,790 --> 00:10:35,399 in cross-section so we can see in the 289 00:10:39,170 --> 00:10:37,800 pink box that is space egg and it 290 00:10:41,870 --> 00:10:39,180 outperforms other state-of-the-art 291 00:10:45,069 --> 00:10:41,880 techniques for identifying 292 00:10:47,569 --> 00:10:45,079 um planar features in imagery 293 00:10:50,690 --> 00:10:47,579 and identifies Palms as Ripple bed 294 00:10:53,509 --> 00:10:50,700 Junctions with an 89 accuracy rate 295 00:10:55,910 --> 00:10:53,519 but 89 is not that great we thought we 296 00:10:57,590 --> 00:10:55,920 could do more if we had more images so 297 00:11:02,150 --> 00:10:57,600 once covered restrictions lifted a 298 00:11:03,590 --> 00:11:02,160 little bit we took 800 more images to uh 299 00:11:07,009 --> 00:11:03,600 kind of do phase two of this project 300 00:11:10,250 --> 00:11:07,019 wherein we developed SpaceX 2.0 301 00:11:13,069 --> 00:11:10,260 which instead uses used a combination of 302 00:11:17,090 --> 00:11:13,079 Aurora and base net shown here this 303 00:11:21,170 --> 00:11:17,100 paper is currently in review and this 304 00:11:23,750 --> 00:11:21,180 um gave us a 92.32 accuracy so much 305 00:11:26,269 --> 00:11:23,760 improved and again we see that it 306 00:11:29,030 --> 00:11:26,279 outperforms other techniques 307 00:11:31,790 --> 00:11:29,040 as well as our original space egg 308 00:11:33,590 --> 00:11:31,800 so you can see it's much better at 309 00:11:36,530 --> 00:11:33,600 segmenting out the planar features that 310 00:11:39,949 --> 00:11:36,540 we are interested in and like really 311 00:11:41,329 --> 00:11:39,959 concentrating on the regions of Interest 312 00:11:42,889 --> 00:11:41,339 so 313 00:11:46,670 --> 00:11:42,899 to kind of 314 00:11:48,350 --> 00:11:46,680 conclude Palm says ripples are an 315 00:11:50,210 --> 00:11:48,360 important and definitive biosignature 316 00:11:52,610 --> 00:11:50,220 that should be included in Target 317 00:11:54,410 --> 00:11:52,620 structures on Mars and we have developed 318 00:11:57,350 --> 00:11:54,420 a technique for accurately detecting 319 00:11:59,150 --> 00:11:57,360 them using automated methodologies which 320 00:12:00,530 --> 00:11:59,160 is potentially useful for our search for 321 00:12:02,750 --> 00:12:00,540 Life on Mars 322 00:12:04,430 --> 00:12:02,760 um and just to say our next steps this 323 00:12:07,130 --> 00:12:04,440 project is not done our next step is to 324 00:12:09,110 --> 00:12:07,140 develop a classifier where we can feed 325 00:12:10,850 --> 00:12:09,120 through a bulk of images of different 326 00:12:13,009 --> 00:12:10,860 different geologic features it will be 327 00:12:15,170 --> 00:12:13,019 able to sort out between likely pound 328 00:12:18,290 --> 00:12:15,180 says Ripples and non-palm test Ripple 329 00:12:20,449 --> 00:12:18,300 cross sections and then those likely 330 00:12:23,030 --> 00:12:20,459 Palm says Ripple cross sections will be 331 00:12:25,730 --> 00:12:23,040 fed into space egg 2.0 and that will 332 00:12:29,210 --> 00:12:25,740 give us a probability of 333 00:12:30,829 --> 00:12:29,220 um the presence of a pounce Ripples and 334 00:12:33,050 --> 00:12:30,839 we'll also have the ability to classify 335 00:12:33,949 --> 00:12:33,060 morphology and other aspects of these 336 00:12:38,269 --> 00:12:33,959 features 337 00:12:40,370 --> 00:12:38,279 so with that I would like to thank 338 00:12:41,990 --> 00:12:40,380 um on my funding sources as well as 339 00:12:44,449 --> 00:12:42,000 everyone who contributed to this product 340 00:12:46,430 --> 00:12:44,459 project through taking imagery of ground 341 00:12:48,230 --> 00:12:46,440 truth thing and I would like to thank 342 00:12:50,509 --> 00:12:48,240 Ross and June Fargo for access to the 343 00:12:52,670 --> 00:12:50,519 milpinia national park on their property 344 00:12:55,129 --> 00:12:52,680 and acknowledge that this land lies 345 00:12:57,650 --> 00:12:55,139 within the traditional lands and again 346 00:12:58,920 --> 00:12:57,660 there's a QR code for the life RCN 347 00:13:02,810 --> 00:12:58,930 thanks 348 00:13:07,009 --> 00:13:04,550 happy 349 00:13:08,389 --> 00:13:07,019 okay fantastic Rachel do we have any 350 00:13:13,670 --> 00:13:08,399 questions 351 00:13:17,930 --> 00:13:15,650 uh I was wondering first of all thank 352 00:13:20,329 --> 00:13:17,940 you for a great talk uh I was wondering 353 00:13:22,910 --> 00:13:20,339 does anything about those Ripples and 354 00:13:24,590 --> 00:13:22,920 texture or any other factors change 355 00:13:26,329 --> 00:13:24,600 um over the course of percambrian so 356 00:13:28,250 --> 00:13:26,339 like connect are there any connections 357 00:13:30,829 --> 00:13:28,260 like major events like oxygenation or 358 00:13:33,410 --> 00:13:30,839 other things and if so like can we infer 359 00:13:35,569 --> 00:13:33,420 anything can we infer any like make any 360 00:13:37,430 --> 00:13:35,579 past climate inferences for something 361 00:13:40,449 --> 00:13:37,440 like Mars this is a really good question 362 00:13:44,870 --> 00:13:40,459 and talk to me after I finish my postdoc 363 00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:53,750 anyone else 364 00:13:57,829 --> 00:13:55,670 so I'm wondering if there's any images 365 00:14:00,230 --> 00:13:57,839 from Mars that this can be applied to 366 00:14:02,269 --> 00:14:00,240 now or we just have to reorient the 367 00:14:03,650 --> 00:14:02,279 cameras to sort of start doing that 368 00:14:05,750 --> 00:14:03,660 there are definitely images that this 369 00:14:07,310 --> 00:14:05,760 can be applied to it like that's kind of 370 00:14:09,889 --> 00:14:07,320 why I'm like harping on this 371 00:14:11,150 --> 00:14:09,899 biosignature because it's a like most of 372 00:14:14,870 --> 00:14:11,160 our imagery we're getting is of 373 00:14:17,569 --> 00:14:14,880 cross-sections from the Martian surface 374 00:14:18,769 --> 00:14:17,579 um so yeah where once we have the 375 00:14:20,629 --> 00:14:18,779 classifier we're going to start running 376 00:14:22,430 --> 00:14:20,639 them through from what I've seen just 377 00:14:23,389 --> 00:14:22,440 like looking at them I don't see 378 00:14:25,550 --> 00:14:23,399 anything 379 00:14:30,350 --> 00:14:25,560 um that would look like it but it's an 380 00:14:35,150 --> 00:14:33,110 I I was just wondering uh wondering if 381 00:14:37,250 --> 00:14:35,160 you guys were using any kind of like uh 382 00:14:39,350 --> 00:14:37,260 like depth data for this because it 383 00:14:41,689 --> 00:14:39,360 feels like these uh sort of in the 384 00:14:44,090 --> 00:14:41,699 images that looked very quite 3D and you 385 00:14:46,850 --> 00:14:44,100 know if you have like two images yeah so 386 00:14:49,550 --> 00:14:46,860 we did we did um take that into 387 00:14:51,650 --> 00:14:49,560 consideration kind of looking at the the 388 00:14:53,210 --> 00:14:51,660 depth of the images and it didn't really 389 00:14:54,829 --> 00:14:53,220 change 390 00:14:56,930 --> 00:14:54,839 um kind of the performance of the 391 00:14:59,569 --> 00:14:56,940 program so I believe it's incorporated 392 00:15:02,750 --> 00:14:59,579 into it but it's not a huge aspect of it 393 00:15:06,290 --> 00:15:04,310 okay we're going to take one more over 394 00:15:13,370 --> 00:15:06,300 here oh Mike is itching to ask a 395 00:15:17,090 --> 00:15:15,829 hi interesting talk kind of similar um 396 00:15:19,129 --> 00:15:17,100 have you ever thought about applying 397 00:15:22,430 --> 00:15:19,139 this to like maybe like 398 00:15:24,889 --> 00:15:22,440 um debated diagnostic like bio faces 399 00:15:29,030 --> 00:15:24,899 that are in the fossil record like um 400 00:15:32,509 --> 00:15:31,970 I'm not quite clear on what you're like 401 00:15:34,189 --> 00:15:32,519 um 402 00:15:36,590 --> 00:15:34,199 just similar like at least other like 403 00:15:39,050 --> 00:15:36,600 stromatilator microbial systems that 404 00:15:41,090 --> 00:15:39,060 like have debated like um sources yeah 405 00:15:41,870 --> 00:15:41,100 that's a really interesting question 406 00:15:44,269 --> 00:15:41,880 um 407 00:15:47,750 --> 00:15:44,279 no so this is like specifically 408 00:15:49,490 --> 00:15:47,760 developed just for like this one feature 409 00:15:52,250 --> 00:15:49,500 um I think it is work that other people 410 00:15:54,769 --> 00:15:52,260 are doing that are not me 411 00:15:56,930 --> 00:15:54,779 um but yeah there's definitely other 412 00:15:58,430 --> 00:15:56,940 like computer vision programs that have 413 00:15:59,389 --> 00:15:58,440 been developed to identify similar 414 00:16:02,629 --> 00:15:59,399 features 415 00:16:06,050 --> 00:16:04,550 all right we're gonna let Mike ask a 416 00:16:11,389 --> 00:16:06,060 question he's been working hard for us 417 00:16:16,370 --> 00:16:14,030 this is actually my question not online 418 00:16:17,810 --> 00:16:16,380 um I'm just curious uh if you did see 419 00:16:19,310 --> 00:16:17,820 something on Mars what would you need to 420 00:16:20,689 --> 00:16:19,320 actually confirm that could you do it 421 00:16:22,370 --> 00:16:20,699 visually or would you need sample return 422 00:16:24,230 --> 00:16:22,380 or 423 00:16:25,910 --> 00:16:24,240 yeah that's a really good question I'm 424 00:16:28,970 --> 00:16:25,920 from my perspective I think it's like a 425 00:16:31,730 --> 00:16:28,980 first pass ID I think like 426 00:16:34,069 --> 00:16:31,740 there's it is a definitive bio signature 427 00:16:37,129 --> 00:16:34,079 but I wouldn't never want to just like 428 00:16:39,370 --> 00:16:37,139 say oh space egg 2.0 said there's like a 429 00:16:41,269 --> 00:16:39,380 99 chance and that's definitive evidence 430 00:16:44,470 --> 00:16:41,279 I think 431 00:16:46,910 --> 00:16:44,480 um yeah sample return or like further 432 00:16:49,910 --> 00:16:46,920 analysis of 433 00:16:52,120 --> 00:16:49,920 um that section would be needed to like 434 00:16:58,430 --> 00:16:52,130 really definitively say anything